RF Design Magazine


Terminating ultraflexible and high-strength cables
Apr 1, 2007 12:00 PM  By Donald Dodge

Complete cable assembly methods used to meet stringent military specifications will be addressed in this article, including jacket remoAval, shield termination, insulation stripping, and attaching of the contacts to the shield termination and final potting or sealing of the assembly.

Click here for the enhanced PDF version of this article


Foot soldiers in our modern Army now are “walking computers.” Night vision goggles, GPS receivers, computers and radios are becoming commonplace. The interconnecting cables must be lightweight and strong, but still contain all of the circuit conductors to carry out their mission. The cables can be snagged on environmental hazards such as bushes or protrusions from vehicles. Increased strength demand means that the addition of strength members, such as Kevlar or PPO fibers, are now the “norm.”

Satellite cables need to have lightweight shields while still maintaining the same or higher shield effectiveness. Aracon, which is nickel- or silver-plated Kevlar, can assist in these applications. As a plated fiber that will spread across the cable core, it can easily give greater shield coverage than can be obtained with flat or round copper wires.

Ground support equipment, while relying more and more on radio communications, still has the need for robust cables between communication huts. Fiber optics can pass large amounts of data, but there is still the need for power to the equipment. Composite cables can do both. The need for high tensile-strength members to keep the cables from pulling apart as well as crush-resistant materials to protect the fibers calls for tougher materials.

The design process starts with a source control drawing (SCD), as most harsh-environment cables do not conform to the old MIL-spec system. Many cable designs use the material and physical properties and testing requirements from existing MIL-specs as a starting point and then delineate the additional requirements on the SCD

Designing a cable

We can design the cable from the inside out. Starting with the conductors, insulation, cabling, shielding and jacketing.

Conductors made with bare tin or silver-plated copper now need to switch to higher-strength alloys. The move to materials that meet the new European restriction of hazardous substance or (RoHS) had caused problems for many military and medical applications. The RoHS-compatible materials have not had sufficient time to be verified that they can withstand the rugged requirements of today's cables. The high-strength cables have been granted waivers from the RoHS by the European Union (EU).

When the conductor size gets smaller than 30 AWG, consideration of moving to stainless steel as a conductor material needs to be reviewed. Often, for short conductor lengths, the increased resistance of stainless steel can be tolerated. If not, gold or silver plating can be done on the individual strands of a conductor to bring the resistance down to acceptable levels. For terminations, soldering to stainless steel is difficult, whereas the gold- or silver-plated wire can easily be soldered. Crimp contacts can easily be attached to stainless steel. Table 1 lists the strength and conductivity of alloys that can be considered when copper is not strong enough.

After the conductor has been determined, the insulation must be chosen. The environmental considerations determine the temperature rating, solvent resistance and physical characteristics. Many programs now prohibit the use of PVC. Thermoplastic elastomer's (TPEs) have taken the place of many PVC materials. Also, to replace PVC, companies such as GE Plastics have created flexible versions of NORYL that can be extruded to smaller wall thickness's and are tougher than the PVCs they replace.

After insulating the conductors they must be twisted into a cable core. Break strength requirements now require the use of strength members in the center of the core. Kevlar and PPO fibers are common strength members. On occasion, steel wires may be used as the center core. Small aircraft stainless steel conductors can be placed in the core and are often insulated to keep them from abrading into the insulated conductors cabled around them. The strength members must be kept in the center of the cable. We have seen designs where attempts were made to put them in the “valleys” between the insulated conductors. When these cables are put in tension, the strength member must be pulled straight before it can bear the load. The motion inside the cable core of the conductors can and often leads to premature cable failure.

Shields to reduce electromagnetic interference (EMI) are placed over groups of the conductors or the total cable core. EMI can come from the cable or be introduced into the cable from adjacent equipment such as high-powered transmitters and radars. Shields are usually made from materials similar to the cable conductors, including alloys to maintain strength during flexing. Often, in the past, aluminumized Mylar tapes were used for shields. They are suitable for fixed installations and should not be specified for flexing applications as Mylar is notch sensitive and will disintegrate when subjected to continuous flexing.

Aracon, nickel or silver-plated Kevlar can be substituted for copper in shields with a 30% weight savings. For satellites, the weight savings can easily justify the high cost of Aracon. For ground-based units, the cost can sometimes be justified by combining the shield and strength members to reduce the cable size.

The cable jacket is chosen based on environmental conditions, i.e., temperature range, solvent presence, radiation and physical properties. Table 2 can be used for selection of the jacket material. Neoprene is an additional tough jacket material that can be “blown on” over the cable core.

Figure 1 shows a cable with two Aracon shields. The inner shield is over a four-conductor group used with a sensor. The first shield keeps EMI interference from the control wires from interfering with the sensor signals. The overall shield protects the cable from outside interference.

Terminating a cable

With the cable design completed we move on to the termination of these rugged cables.

Connectors must be designed with reinforcing to maintain ruggedness in smaller shapes. The use of newer high-strength materials and the use of conductive fillers allows connectors to be smaller and more robust.

Newer rugged cables now contain strength members such as Kevlar, which must be terminated in the connector. To use a strength member without terminating it, results in a “high-priced” filler. Often, one of the center pin locations can be replaced by a loop or hook to connect with the strength member if the insulation body can withstand the load placed between the strength member attachment and the connector housing. If not, a “spider” for the strength member must be fabricated so that the strength member can be attached to the “spider” and then the load will be transferred to the connector shell.

Cutting the cable to length starts the termination process. Sufficient length to include the lengths of the conductors and shields that will be inside the connector must be included in the length of the cable before cutting. Often, this step is forgotten, resulting in cable assemblies that are too short after assembly.

Jacket removal is the next step that must ensure that the shield, if present, and conductor insulations are not “nicked.” Many of the tough jacket materials will dull the cutting blades faster than before. Blades must be kept sharp or replaced more often than in the past. Inspection of the shield and insulation should be performed to ensure that no “nicking” has occurred.

Electrical shields must have high effectiveness for the greater EMI-CBR fields present on the modern battlefield. Cables containing more than one shield, such as shielded pairs, must maintain isolation between the shields in the cable. This requires that additional pins must be assigned in the connector to allow for isolated shield terminations. Often, the overall shield is terminated to the connector shell. If the shell is a non-conductive material, then a pin needs to be assigned to the shield. The shield is often folded back over the jacket after removal of the jacket so the conductors can be terminated. For shielded jacketed groups within the cable, the jackets also need to be removed and the shields folded back.

The insulation on the conductors must be removed for application to the terminals. With the smaller conductor sizes used today, hot knife strippers are the preferred insulation-stripping tool. Mechanical strippers can easily damage or cut the small, fine strands of these smaller conductors. It is important to use temperature-controlled blades for the strippers to ensure clean, residue-free stripping. Pre tinning of the wires may be done if solder cup termination is used. For crimped contacts they can be crimped on at this time.

For solder cup terminations it is preferred that the soldering be started at the center of circular conductors or the bottom row of parallel conductors. Care must be taken to ensure that the proper wire is attached to each pin. For crimp contacts a similar insertion rotation is used.

Today, often all of a given wire gauge insulations are of the same color. One end of the cable is terminated and then placed on a continuity tester. There are testers that will show the wire number when a grounded finger is touched to a conductor on the other end of the cable. Then the identified conductor can be inserted or soldered to the correct location. Some testers even have audio that will speak the wire number when touched. This assembly method has resulted in far fewer miss-wired cable assemblies.

After the conductors are assembled into the connector, the shields must be terminated to their respective contacts. Some connectors call for the use of double crimp or solder sleeves over and under the braid and then a pigtail is used to terminate the shield to a contact. Other times, the shields are straightened out and the strands are twisted into a conductor that can be terminated.

After the shields and conductors are terminated it is common to pot the back of the connector to maintain the strength of the connections and to prevent moisture from entering the connector.

Final assembly of the connector with its back shell and cable grips can now be completed. Some connectors will even have a second overmolding to keep moisture out of the back shell.

Continuity, high-pot and leakage testing is done to ensure that the cable assembly is properly assembled.

Part numbering and possibly serial numbering can be applied to the cable assembly. It may be sealed and stored in moisture-resistant packaging for shipment.

Table 1. Comparing conductor properties of myriad metals and alloys.
Base Material Alloy Number (UNS) Tensile Strength (PSI) Elongation % Conductivity% IACS Density (pounds/cu. in)
Annealed Hard
Copper
ETP C11000 35,000 68,000 25 100 0.322
Oxygen-free OF C10200 35,000 68,000 25 100 0.322
OF w/silver C10700 35,000 68,000 25 100 0.322
High Strength
CS-95 - 95,000 130,000 6 63 0.319
Tensile flex C18135 60,000 120,000 8 90 0.322
Zr copper C15000 36,000 70,000 25 90 0.322
CT37 - 50,000 95,000 8 80 0.322
CC78 50,000 85,000 8 90 0.321
Cd copper C16200 50,000 110,000 8 90 0.321
Cd copper C16500 45,000 95,000 25 60 0.321
Copper Clad Steel
Class 30 - 60000 127000 15 30 0.294
Class 40 - 55000 110000 15 40 0.294
Class 60 - 45000 90000 20 60 0.294
Class 70 - 40,000 80000 20 70 0.294
Brass
70/30 C26000 60,000 130,000 30 27 0.308
80/20 C24000 55,000 125,000 30 32 0.313
85/15 C23000 48,000 105,000 30 36 0.316
87/13 C22600 45,000 97,000 30 40 0.317
90/10 C22000 45,000 90,000 30 43 0.318
95/5 C21000 45,000 65,000 30 56 0.320
Silicon Bronze
Low (B) 1015 C65100 45000 105000 30 11 0.316
High (A) 1010 C65500 60000 145000 30 7 0.308
Phosphor Bronze
95/5 C51000 57,000 140,000 35 15 0.32
97/3 C50900 53000 125000 35 16 0.321
92/8 C52100 70000 150000 50 12 0.318
Nickel Silver
10% C74500 70000 105000 25 8.4 0.31
12% C75700 70000 93000 25 7.7 0.31
18% C75200 70000 103000 25 6.2 0.316
Aluminum
EC - 15,000 25,000 15 62 0.098
5056 - 45,000 65,000 15 29 0.095
Other
Nickel 200 65000 150000 25 18 0.321
CCAL - 17000 23000 10 62 0.121
Silver - 18000 55,000 30 108 0.379
Steel LC 55000 110,000 20 13 0.284
Stainless steel 304 125000 250000 30 2.3 0.286
Stainless 316L 63000 137000 57 41.47 0.287

Table 2. Common properties of insulation and jacketing materials.
Material Nom. Specific Gravity Voltage Breakdown (volts/mil) Abrasion Resistance Nom. Dielec. Constant Flame-Retardant Properties Flexibility
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) 1.37 500 Good 5-8 Excellent Good
Polyethylene — solid 0.95 600 Good 2.1 Poor Fair
Polyethylene — foam 0.50 n/a Poor 1.5 Poor Good
Teflon (FEP) 2.20 600 Excellent 2.1 Excellent Fair
Teflon (PFA) 2.14 2,000 Excellent 2.0 Excellent Fair
Tefzel 1.70 400 Excellent 2.7 Excellent Fair
Nylon 1.07 450 Excellent 4.0 Poor Poor
Polypropylene 0.91 650 Excellent 2.2 Poor Poor
Polyurethane 1.10 500 Excellent 7.0 Poor Excellent
Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE) 1.00 650 Excellent 2.4 Good Good
Hytrel 1.20 860 Excellent 6.0 Fair Fair
Silicone 1.32 600 Fair 3.0 Fair Excellent
Fluorosilicone 1.40 350 Excellent 7.0 Excellent Excellent
Neoprene 1.30 250 Excellent N/A Excellent Excellent

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Donald Dodge is vice president of Research at Calmont Wire and Cable.



February/March 2012
Part Finder
Search our directory of over 10 million parts.



Popular Searches:
AMP/Tyco Electronics
Maxim Integrated Products
Analog Devices
Molex
Freescale Semiconductor
Advanced Micro Devices
Texas Instruments

 
Back to Top