RF Design Magazine


ESD-protected RF filter with on-chip passive and active elements
Nov 1, 2006 12:00 PM  By H. Böhm, H. Kebinger, R. Losehand, and H. Heiss

A monolithic integrated multiband PCN/PCS RF-bandpass filter manufactured on highly resistive silicon substrate with mode conversion and ESD protection is described. In order to analyze the ESD behavior of the filter, an ESD simulation model is presented and compared with measurement results.

ESD model

EOS and ESD damage affects device functionality and RF performance. Therefore, it is important to make thorough investigations concerning ESD protection, especially for the MIM capacitors, in order to guarantee the required ESD robustness.

Figure 5 shows a complete ESD simulation setup consisting of the implemented ESD model (HBM, MM or CDM), the parasitics of the measurement setup, and the device under test (DUT). The investigations are focused on HBM, with corresponding values for RM = 1500 Ω, CM = 100 pF, and LM = 0 nH 5.

In order to investigate the ESD protection of the filter sub-circuits (LD || CD), a simple ESD model was developed. First of all, parasitic board elements are neglected so that only the parameter for HBM and the filter sub-circuit are considered. For this case, a linear differential equation of third order with the general solution is obtained.

x(t) = (UCM, UCD, ILD)T is the state vector corresponding to the state variables of the electrical network, where A represents the system matrix.

With the initial conditions for current and voltages, the vector x0 is given by (U0, 0, 0)T.

Figure 6 shows the simulation results of equation 1 for the voltage drop at the capacitor CD (1 pF) for different L values ranging from 1 nH to 30 nH. Improved ESD protection for the capacitor CD can be achieved with smaller values of the inductance LD. Additionally, the inductor LD of the LC resonator determines the pole of the transfer function and is, therefore, important for the overall filter performance.

To investigate the complete ESD setup, the board parasitics must be determined and included in the circuit simulator. The parameter extraction for the board parasitics is carried out in the following manner: First, the measurement equipment is characterized by current discharge for different terminations (0 Ω and 500 Ω) for the DUT, with which the board elements can be determined. Figure 7 shows simulated and measured results for a shorted device under test.

Transient simulations for the PCN/PCS bandpass filter with internal active and passive elements were carried out with the circuit simulator (ADS) from Agilent. Figure 8 shows the simulation results of the voltage drop for several MIM capacitors and reveals the endangered element for ESD damage.

Conclusion

The performance of a monolithic integrated PCN/PCS RF bandpass filter with mode conversion, integrated dc power supply and ESD protection was discussed. Good RF filter performance in combination with ESD protection was achieved. The figure of merits of the RF filter are the insertion loss within the passband of -2.5 dB, the third harmonic suppression of -45 dB, the common mode suppression of -40 dB, and the ESD robustness of more than 3 kV.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank W. Zimmermann for his helpful discussions.

Click here for the enhanced PDF version of this article

References
  1. N.J. Pulsford, J.T.M. van Beek, M.H.W.M. van Delden, and A. Boogaard, “Passive Integration On Si for RF Circuits In Wireless Applications,” Philips Research, IEEE-MTT-S, pp. 1897-1990, 1999.

  2. Dong-Wook Kim, In-Ho Jeong, Ho-Sung Sung, Tong-Ook Kong, Jong-Soo Lee, Choong-Mo Nam, and Young-Se Kwon, “High-performance RF Passive Integration On Si Smart Substrate,” Telephus Inc., IEEE-MTT-S, pp. 1561-1564, 2002.

  3. R. G. Wagner, J. M. Soden, and C. F. Hawkins, “Extent and Cost of EOS/ESD Damage In an IC Manufacturing Process,” EOS/ESD Symposium, Lake Buena Vista, USA, pp. 49-55, 1993.

  4. B. Eisener, K. Büyüktas, A. Rügemer, H. Kebinger, and C. Hertzum, “Monolithic, Integrated High-Q Inductors for RF Applications,” 2003 Topical Meeting on Silicon Monolithic Integrated Circuits in RF Systems, Grainau, Germany, pp. 107-110, 9-11 April 2003.

  5. S. Hyvonen, S. Joshi, and E. Rosenbaum, “Cancellation Technique to Provide ESD Protection for Multi-GHz RF Inputs,” Electronic Letters, vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 284-285, February 2003.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Harald Böhm is a staff engineer at Infineon Technologies AG in Munich, Germany. He holds a Dr.-Ing. degree from Technical University of Munich.

Herbert Kebinger is an RF design engineer at Infineon Technologies AG in Munich, Germany, where he has been involved in application and design engineering in the areas of RF power modules and semiconductors. He is a graduate of the FH München Electrical Engineering.

Reinhard Losehand is an innovation manager in the High-Performance Active and Passive Integration group at Infineon Technologies AG in Munich, Germany. He holds a Dipl. Phys. from Technische Hochschule Munich.

Heinrich Heiss is responsible for technical marketing of silicon discrete components at Infineon Technologies AG in Munich, Germany. He holds Master and Ph.D. degrees from Technical University of Munich.

Previous 1 2



February/March 2012
 
Back to Top